El Hospital General prepara un Comité de Ética Asistencial para el año 2007
El nuevo órgano será consultivo y multidisciplinar, ayudará en los casos que planteén dilemas éticos a los sanitarios y potenciará la participación del paciente en la toma de decisiones
MARÍA ROSELL / CIUDAD REAL
La sociedad actual está sufriendo importantes cambios debido a que cada vez hay una mayor pluralidad racial y cultural. Una situación que está generando nuevos dilemas éticos a los profesionales sanitarios a la hora de determinar de forma adecuada el tratamiento que deben dar al paciente. A causa de estas nuevas dudas, el Gobierno regional ha lanzado una nueva apuesta sanitaria para crear Comités de Ética Asistencial en la red hospitalaria .
Este proyecto tiene un carácter voluntario, y el Hospital General de Ciudad Real es uno de los centros que se ha interesado en incluir este comité «para que sirva de órgano consultivo desde una visión general, ya que será un comité multidisciplinar», tal y como explicó la subdirectora médico en Investigación, Docencia, Formación y Calidad, Teresa Rodríguez Cano.
Se espera que el comité comience a funcionar el año que viene, pero actualmente el proyecto se encuentra en fase promoción ya que el decreto que lo regula entró en vigor en agosto y ha sido a partir de octubre cuando el Hospital General ha recibido las directrices para llevarlo a cabo.
La principal función del Comité de Ética Asistencial será de apoyo y de consulta a los profesional y también a los pacientes con el objetivo de mejorar dicha calidad y tener más en cuente los derechos de los usuarios. Teresa Rodríguez explicó a este periódico que «se pretende abarcar a todo el área asistencial, tanto de Atención Especializada como Primaria». Todo este sector estará representado entre 10 a 15 personalidades que pertenecerán al ámbito licenciado, diplomado. También , se incluirá a un trabajador social , a un profesional especializado de reconocido prestigio en los Derechos Humanos y a un jurídico, aunque como aclaró Teresa Rodríguez, «este órgano no será vinculante y no se tratarán las quejas y reclamaciones».
Con este proyecto, Teresa Rodríguez comentó que «se podrán concretar casos dudosos como por ejemplo qué hacer si a una persona se le diagnostica el VIH, ¿se avisa a su pareja de un posible contagio, o no?, o ¿se debe realizar una transfusión de sangre a una persona que sea testigo de Jehová, aunque su condición no se lo permita?». Este tipo de cuestión se intentarán resolver con el apoyo del comité que se guiará por los principios de autonomía del paciente, la beneficencia y la justicia. Y, teniendo en cuenta, que muchos casos precisarán de rapidez, el comité contará con reuniones ordinarias y con carácter de urgencia.
En estos momentos, se están especificando las misiones concretas con las que trabajará el futuro órgano consultivo que también tiene como fin potenciar la participación del paciente para decidir posibles tratamientos. Pero, además, quiere servir de fórmula para trabajar más en la formación bioética tanto en el ámbito de pregrado como de postgrado y para ello se está preparando un curso, avalado por el Instituto de la Salud Carlos III y el Fiscam que tratará aspectos como las cuestiones éticas con el inicio y el fin de la vida, la organización y gestión de los servicios desde un punto de vista ético o la sociología de la Salud, entre otros puntos que se repartirán en 16 módulos y que podrá equipararse a una diplomatura.
El Hospital General de Ciudad Real ha celebrado esta semana un curso de Bioética, titulado Conflictos éticos más frecuentes en la atención hospitalaria, dirigido al personal auxiliar del centro, como respuesta a potenciar la formación ética que está llevando a cabo la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha. Así, alrededor de 40 profesionales, y de manos del Centro de la Humanización de la Salud, han descubierto qué problemas son los más frecuentes en este sentido, han aprendido a analizarlos y a afrontar estos conflictos.
LONDON (Reuters) – The earth has a fever that could boost temperatures by 8 degrees Celsius making large parts of the surface uninhabitable and threatening billions of peoples’ lives, a controversial climate scientist said on Tuesday.
James Lovelock, who angered climate scientists with his Gaia theory of a living planet and then alienated environmentalists by backing nuclear power, said a traumatized earth might only be able to support less than a tenth of it’s 6 billion people.
“We are not all doomed. An awful lot of people will die, but I don’t see the species dying out,” he told a news conference. “A hot earth couldn’t support much over 500 million.”
“Almost all of the systems that have been looked at are in positive feedback … and soon those effects will be larger than any of the effects of carbon dioxide emissions from industry and so on around the world,” he added.
Scientists say that global warming due to carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels for power and transport could boost average temperatures by up to 6C by the end of the century causing floods, famines and violent storms.
But they also say that tough action now to cut carbon emissions could stop atmospheric concentrations of CO2 hitting 450 parts per million — equivalent to a temperature rise of 2C from pre-industrial levels — and save the planet.
Lovelock said temperature rises of up to 8C were already built in and while efforts to curb it were morally commendable, they were wasted.
“It is a bit like if your kidneys fail you can go on dialysis — and who would refuse dialysis if death is the alternative. We should think of it in that context,” he said.
“But remember that all they are doing is buying us time, no more. The problems go on,” he added.
REFUGE
Lovelock adopted the name Gaia, the Greek mother earth goddess, in the 1960s to apply to his then revolutionary theory that the earth functions as a single, self-sustaining organism. His theory is now widely accepted.
In London to give a lecture on the environment to the Institution of Chemical Engineers, he said the planet had survived dramatic climate change at least seven times.
“In the change from the last Ice Age to now we lost land equivalent to the continent of Africa beneath the sea,” he said. “We are facing things just as bad or worse than that during this century.”
“There are refuges, plenty of them. 55 million years ago … life moved up to the Arctic, stayed there during the course of it and then moved back again as things improved. I fear that this is what we may have to do,” he added.
Lovelock said the United States, which has rejected the Kyoto Protocol on cutting carbon emissions, wrongly believed there was a technological solution, while booming economies China and India were out of control.
China is building a coal-fired power station a week to feed rampant demand, and India’s economy is likewise surging.
If either suddenly decided to stop their carbon-fuelled development to lift their billions of people out of poverty they would face a revolution, yet if they continued, rising CO2 and temperatures would kill off plants and produce famine, he said.
“If climate change goes on course … I can’t see China being able to produce enough food by the middle of the century to support its people. They will have to move somewhere and Siberia is empty and it will be warmer then,” he said.
UZBEKISTAN: Despite official denials, religious freedom violations continue
By Igor Rotar, Forum 18 News Service , and
Felix Corley, Forum 18 News Service
Repression of religious communities from the majority community Islam to religious minorities such as Christians has increased, Forum 18 News Service notes. Protestants have been attacked in state-controlled mass media, such as a student, Tahir Sharipov, accused of holding “secretive meetings with singing,” and pressure is applied to stop ethnic Uzbeks attending Protestant churches. Andrei Shirobokov, a Jehovah’s Witness spokesperson, told Forum 18 that he has had to leave the country as “my friends in the law enforcement agencies warned me that an attempt was to be made on my life.” Religious minority sources have told Forum 18 that schoolteachers have been instructed to find out the religious communities schoolchildren attend and where their parents work. US designation of Uzbekistan as a “Country of Particular Concern” for religious freedom violations has drawn a harsh response. Forum 18 has itself been accused of trying “at every opportunity to accuse Uzbekistan without foundation of repressing believers.”
With a continuing and growing catalogue of government repression of Muslims, Christians, Jehovah’s Witnesses and other religious minorities that Forum 18 News Service and others have documented, the Uzbek Foreign Ministry on 13 November reacted harshly to the recent designation of Uzbekistan by the United States government as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) for religious freedom violations. Forum 18 notes that, in an apparent sign of increasing nervousness over how the increasingly repressive situation within the country is seen abroad, the Uzbek government has started using more sophisticated websites in Uzbek, Russian and English, to try to counter reports of the situation in the country.
Controls on the majority religious community – Islam – have tightened in the past year, with new arrests of Muslims accused of being dangerous radicals. Control of Islamic literature has been stepped up, while imams have reportedly been instructed about the undesirability of children attending mosques and police in Bukhara have prevented children attending the mosque (see F18News 2 November 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=864).
Religious minorities are facing mounting pressure. Six Baptists detained after a 27 August raid on a church in Karshi [Qarshi] were given massive fines on 25 October. As is often happens, the court ordered Bibles and other literature to be burnt. A Pentecostal church in Tashkent was raided by some 30 police officers on 13 November, with one of those detained subsequently fined (see F18News 27 November 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=877). These are the latest in a string of similar attacks on Protestants, Jehovah’s Witnesses and Hare Krishna devotees.
Protestants have also come under attack in the state-controlled media. A Protestant student in the capital Tashkent, Tahir Sharipov, was the subject of a highly critical article in the Russian-language daily Narodnoe Slovo on 13 October for holding religious meetings in his flat to attract young people – particularly ethnic Uzbeks – to Christianity. The journalist noted the Uzbekistan’s Constitution claimed guarantees of religious freedom. “But,” he went on, “missionary activity – that is propaganda for your faith and attracting new members to it – is against the law. For that you need permission from the state authorities, as well as appropriate permission from the governing central body of a religious organisation, in whose name the missionary is working. Tahir Sharipov did not have these authorisations.”
The journalist said that after Sharipov’s neighbour had reported him to the police for holding “secretive meetings with singing”, police raided the flat during a religious meeting, finding people without local residence registration and “thousands (!)” [emphasis in the original] of items of religious literature. The journalist said that Sharipov was given a “small” unspecified fine, and that two Protestants were claimed to have signed statements renouncing their faith. The journalist did not indicate what pressures were applied to the Protestants.
The Religious Affairs Committee told the journalist that, in recent months in Tashkent alone, courts had punished a number of people for “illegal” religious and missionary activity. Six were punished for allowing their homes to be used for worship, while three students were warned for unspecified reasons.
One Protestant leader complained to Forum 18 in early November that there is now pressure on them for ethnic Uzbeks not to attend Protestant churches. The leader said they have been told that it is no problem for ethnic Russians and Koreans to attend, but not Uzbeks. Earlier this year some Protestant churches were banned from holding services in Uzbek (see F18News 16 October 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=855).
Pressure has also been stepped up on Jehovah’s Witnesses, who now have only one legal religious community in Uzbekistan (see F18News 5 September 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=837).
Andrei Shirobokov, spokesperson for the Jehovah’s Witnesses in Uzbekistan, told Forum 18 that he has had to leave the country for his own safety. “Strangers were regularly coming to my home at night and demanding that I leave the house for ‘a talk’. I am in no doubt that this was deliberate provocation on the part of the authorities because of my religious beliefs,” he told Forum 18 from Russia on 23 November. “My friends in the law enforcement agencies warned me that an attempt was to be made on my life.”
Shirobokov said that, before leaving for Russia, he tried to obtain an exit visa. This is under Uzbek law necessary for travel outside the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), an association of twelve former Soviet republics. However, officials at the Visa and Registration Department in Tashkent’s Yunusobad district refused to issue an exit visa to him. “They told me I was registered as a Jehovah’s Witness at the Anti-terrorism and Extremism Department,” he told Forum 18. “Without an exit visa I cannot leave the CIS, and I cannot be sure that the Uzbek secret police will not try to “deal” with me on Russian territory.”
Forum 18 was unable to reach officials at the Yunusobad Visa and Registration Department, by telephone, to find out why Shirobokov was refused an exit visa.
Several separate religious minority sources in Tashkent have told Forum 18 that all school teachers received an instruction following the 1 September start of the school year, to find out what religious communities (if any) schoolchildren in their class attend, together with details of where their parents work. Forum 18 has been unable to contact any education officials to confirm these reports.
The US Government’s 13 November designation of Uzbekistan as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) was criticised in a 24 November statement on the Foreign Ministry website, as well as on other state-run websites uzreport.com and press-uz.info. This relatively swift response follows rebuttals earlier this year by Uzbek official spokespersons of Forum 18′s reports, particularly when Forum 18 reported the tightening of official censorship of all religious literature in June (see F18News 29 June 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=805).
On 3 July, press-uz.info ran a rebuttal from Aziz Obidov, the then spokesperson for the government’s Religious Affairs Committee, defending the measures as protecting Uzbek citizens from literature produced by “false religions and radical/extremist doctrines”. He claimed that some groups “continue aggressive missionary activities, ignoring local realities.” Forum 18 was itself accused by Obidov of “beating the air” and trying “at every opportunity to accuse Uzbekistan without foundation of repressing believers”.
The past year has seen increased government control of all religious activity in Uzbekistan. New restrictions have been proposed to punish religious leaders if any members of their communities share their faith with others (see F18News 21 August 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=833) and censorship of religious literature has been intensified (see F18News 29 June 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=805), while massively increased fines for unregistered religious activity were introduced at the end of 2005 (see F18News 27 January 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=720).
Foreign non-governmental organisations with any kind of religious affiliation or suspected of having a religious affiliation have been closed down (see F18News 10 October 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=852) and foreign citizens involved in religious activity have been deported (see F18News 21 August 2006 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=833).
In its response to the United States’ CPC designation of Uzbekistan for violations of religious freedom, the Uzbek Foreign Ministry http://www.mfa.uz condemned what it called a “one-sided approach” and “double-standards” on the part of the US. It claimed that members of eighteen religious faiths “freely practice their faith” and denied any cases “in the last few years” of inter-religious conflict or tensions between religious faiths and the government. This denial was issued despite numerous cases of state assaults on religious freedom, documented by Forum 18 and others.
The Foreign Ministry claimed – without any evidence – that what it regards as “Uzbekistan’s experience in achieving mutual understanding and mutual respect” has been recognised “in all recent major conferences, seminars and meetings” held by the United Nations. In fact, the United Nations has been highly critical of the human rights – including religious freedom – situation in Uzbekistan. An 18 October report by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan (A/61/526 – available in PDF format from within http://www.ohchr.org/english/bodies/GA/61documents.htm) concluded that, given the government’s failure to set up an independent enquiry into the brutal crushing of the Andijan uprising in May 2005 and the “persistence of allegations of serious human rights violations”, it could see “no improvement” in the human rights situation.
Secretary-General Annan also pointed to the persistent failure of the Uzbek government to respond to requests for UN human rights rapporteurs to visit Uzbekistan to conduct their own investigations. This includes Uzbekistan’s failure to invite Asma Jahangir, the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, whose repeated requests to visit since 2004 have received no answer (see F18News 25 January 2006 < http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=718).
In a curious comment, the Uzbek Foreign Ministry statement claims that the Constitution and laws create conditions for religious freedom for the country’s “traditional religions.” It then goes on to state: “As for the activity of various missionary religious movements and sects, in this question the Uzbek side sticks to the basic principles” of the Religion Law. This bans “missionary” activity. Although the Foreign Ministry appears to imply that “traditional” faiths are protected while other faiths are not, Forum 18 notes that all religious faiths are subjected to tight government controls, especially Islam, that is controlled from inside as a de facto branch of the state (see Forum 18′s Uzbekistan religious freedom survey http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=777).
New Uzbek Foreign Ministry spokesperson Aziz Obidov – until recently the spokesperson for the Supreme Court and the Religious Affairs Committee – explained to Forum 18 that the government regards as “traditional faiths” those that have official registration with the country’s Justice Ministry. In some other former Soviet republics “traditional faiths” are mentioned in laws – in Russia Orthodoxy, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism are singled out as “traditional” in the preamble to the religion law – but not in Uzbekistan’s religion law. “We also have religions that have had their adherents in Uzbekistan for centuries,” Obidov told Forum 18 on 27 November from Tashkent.
“However,” Obidov continued, “the Foreign Ministry in its statement used the term ‘traditional’ in the widest sense. New religions have arrived in Uzbekistan in the last ten to fifteen years and have gained registration at the Justice Ministry. We believe this is enough time to regard them as ‘traditional’.” He did not explain why registered religious communities – including Muslims, Protestants and Jehovah’s Witnesses – also face repression for peacefully practising their faith.
Obidov warned Forum 18 to give only “objective and thoroughly considered information” and recommended that Forum 18 gain accreditation with his ministry. The Foreign Ministry denied Forum 18 accreditation three years ago, claiming that Forum 18 “is not a mass medium.” In August 2005 Forum 18′s correspondent was detained, but was released and deported following international pressure (see F18News 16 August 2005 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=631).
Les Témoins de Jéhovah ont été “cités pas moins de 415 fois au cours des auditions publiques” de cette commission, alors qu’ils ne s’estiment pas concernés par ses travaux, écrivent-ils dans une lettre adressée aux membres de la commission des Lois de l’Assemblée.
“Respectueux des lois de la République, nous sommes contraints d’élever une protestation légitime et de rétablir les faits”, ajoutent-ils, avant la remise prévue le 19 décembre du rapport de la commission d’enquête sur l’influence des sectes sur les enfants qui prévoit de recommander des mesures réglementaires et législatives.
“Une nouvelle fois, nous ne pouvons que regretter une présentation de notre culte qui masque la réalité”, écrivent les Témoins de Jéhovah en citant des passages tirés des auditions publiques de la commission, “nos 250.000 fidèles constatent avec tristesse ces nouveaux dérapages au caractère inique”.
Parallèlement, ils rendent publique leur réponse à un questionnaire envoyé en septembre par la commission d’enquête, qui ne les a pas auditionnés. Ils estiment ne pas entrer dans son champ d’investigation et jugent que leur activité ne trouble pas l’ordre public. Ils soulignent que leurs enfants fréquentent l’école publique et qu’ils sont présents en France depuis plus d’un siècle.
Ils s’appuient sur plusieurs décisions de justice, notamment du Conseil d’Etat en 2000, alors que l’administration a reconnu le caractère cultuel de plus de 930 de ses associations dans 98 départements.
En outre, ajoutent-ils, le Conseil d’Etat a confirmé le 3 juillet 2006 le caractère “succinct et anodin” des informations des Renseignements généraux ayant servi de base en 1995 aux travaux de la première commission parlementaire sur les sectes, qui avait inscrit les Témoins de Jéhovah sur une liste des sectes.
Un vif échange avait opposé mi-octobre à leur propos le chef du bureau des cultes au ministère de l’Intérieur Didier Leschi à des membres de la commission d’enquête qui l’auditionnaient. M. Leschi avait rappelé la jurisprudence sur le caractère cultuel de l’organisation et souligné ne pas avoir connaissance à son propos de plaintes ou condamnations pour maltraitance d’enfants.
Le président et le rapporteur de la commission, Georges Fenech (UMP) et Philippe Vuilque (PS), avaient dit leur stupéfaction considérant qu’on ne pouvait pas ignorer la maltraitance psychologique des enfants de Témoins de Jéhovah dont ont témoigné d’anciens adeptes, évoquant aussi l’interdiction des transfusions sanguines, le porte-à-porte prosélytique, etc.
De puerta en puerta por toda la ciudad, con la Biblia en la mano
unos 400 testigos de jehová se reúnen en los tres salones del reino que existen en la ciudad
donostia. “La mayoría nos conoce por ir de puerta en puerta”. Javier Garoña y José Martín Arostegi son dos de los Testigos de Jehová que se reúnen en el Salón del Reino que tienen en Intxaurrondo. Además, cuentan con otros dos salones en Donostia, en Jai-Alai y en Altza, y con unas 400 personas que forman las congregaciones de la ciudad. Aunque muchos ciudadanos no tienen del todo claro en qué consiste ser un testigo de Jehová.
“Nosotros estudiamos la Biblia y tratamos de aplicarla en el día a día, porque eso nos beneficia, y después tratamos de compartirlo con todos y acercarles esas enseñanzas de la Biblia”, explican.
Además de predicar casa por casa, se reúnen tres veces por semana en uno de los salones. Uno de sus miembros, normalmente alguno de los ancianos que forman parte de cada congregación, o que visita un salón procedente de otro lugar, ofrece un discurso acerca de pasajes de la Biblia. Después, se abre un turno de preguntas y respuestas para crear una especie de debate entre todos.
Ni la presencia de los salones ni los propios Testigos de Jehová son nuevos en Donostia: en los años treinta ya había un grupo de “hermanos” en Bilbao y en Donostia, también, en la década de los 50. “Aunque entonces se reunían en clandestinidad, en sus propias casas, para estudiar la Biblia”, explica Garoña. En 1970 se renoció su existencia y a partir de ese momento se expandieron.
Desde entonces, aseguran que la crisis generalizada de fe que vive Occidente no les está afectando: “El número de testigos continúa creciendo en unos 250.000 nuevos miembros al año en todo el mundo, es decir, 700 a diario, y es tremendo, sobre todo, porque es consecuencia de una decisión personal que llega tras un proceso, después de estudiar la Biblia: no se pasa a ser parte de los Testigos de Jehová sólo por nacer en una determinada familia”, señala.
En Donostia también han recibido en los últimos años la llegada de personas procedentes, sobre todo, de Latinoamérica que eran ya miembros de congregaciones allí, a quienes han ayudado a instalarse, aunque no sea en un número excesivamente significativo.
Además, Garoña destaca el trabajo que algunos miembros hacen en centros penitenciarios de todo el Estado: “No hay ningún Testigo de Jehová encarcelado, aunque creemos que los presos tienen también derecho a estudiar la Biblia y nosotros les queremos dar esa oportunidad”, apunta. Otro de los aspectos más sociales de su labor consiste en traducir sus discursos al lenguaje de signos, que muchos de ellos ya dominan. >a.z.
Assemblea dei Testimoni di Geova – L’assemblea di circoscrizione in lingua italiana dei Testimoni di Geova dell’Ontario si terrà il 25 e il 26 novembre con inizio alle 9.30 presso l’Assembly Hall of Jehovah’s Witnesses sita al 2594 Highway 7 W.Tema dell’assemblea sarà “Accumulatevi tesori in cielo” e analizzerà le difficoltà quotidiane affrontate per sfuggire al materialismo. Il discorso “Come potete sopravvivere al giorno del furore di Geova?” verrà pronunciato il 26 novembre alle 13.30. Ingresso libero.
Dai due ai sei giorni di lavoro compiuto da volontari testimoni di Geova, non retribuiti.
Vi presento un video, fatto con una tecnica speciale, in cui la macchina da presa rimane ferma in un trepiede e si riprendono i fotogrammi … all » a intervalli molto distanziati, in modo che una giornata di attività si possa poi visionare in pochi minuti. Le riprese mostrano alcune costruzioni rapide di Sale del Regno compiute da volontari testimoni di Geova, tutti non retribuiti, che in due o tre giorni riescono a costruire grandi e spaziose Sale del Regno per le loro riunioni. …
Every Canadian household needs an emergency plan. It will help you and your family know what to do in case of an emergency.
Complete your emergency plan online now — this will take about 20 minutes.
Make sure everyone in your home knows the plan and keeps completed printouts of it in an easy-to-find, easy-to-remember place (with your emergency kit, for example). You may also want to make duplicate copies to keep in your car and at work.
Before starting, you will need to know the following:
where the exits are from your home and neighbourhood
a meeting place to reunite with family or roommates
a designated person to pick up your children should you be unavailable
close and out-of-town contact persons
health information
a place for your pet to stay
the risks in your region
the location of your fire extinguisher, water valve, electrical box, gas valve and floor drain.
Tous les foyers canadiens ont besoin d’un plan d’urgence. Grâce à ce plan, votre famille et vous-même saurez quoi faire en situation d’urgence.
Préparez votre plan d’urgence en ligne maintenant — ce qui prend une vingtaine de minutes.
Assurez-vous que tous les membres de votre famille connaissent le plan, et conservez-en des copies à portée de la main dans un endroit facile à retenir (avec votre trousse d’urgence, par exemple). Vous pouvez également faire des photocopies du plan et les conserver dans votre véhicule et/ou à votre lieu de travail.
Avant de commencer, vous devez avoir en votre possession les renseignements suivants :
les endroits où se trouvent les sorties de votre résidence et les voies publiques permettant de sortir de votre quartier,
un lieu de rassemblement pour les membres de votre famille, vos colocataires ou vous-même,
une personne désignée qui ira chercher vos enfants si vous n’êtes pas en mesure de le faire,
les coordonnées de personnes-ressources à l’intérieur et à l’extérieur de votre secteur,
les renseignements médicaux pertinents,
un endroit pour votre animal de compagnie,
les risques dans votre région
l’emplacement de votre extincteur, du robinet d’adduction d’eau, de la boîte de disjoncteurs, de la valve à gaz et du siphon de sol.
Comentarios recientes